Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adam Pavlasek vs Norbert Gombos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pavlasek vs Gombos analysis and find out who is favored!
Adam Pavlasek vs Norbert Gombos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pavlasek 2 - 2 Gombos
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavlasek has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Gombos has won 47.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavlasek, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gombos has won 48.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavlasek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gombos has saved 56.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavlasek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gombos winning 35.29% (W/L 12/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavlasek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 206/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 22/ 26). Gombos has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 261/ 185), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Pavlasek winning 2 times and Gombos being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Pavlasek winning 4 and Gombos winning 5. The last match between Pavlasek and Gombos was at the Prostejov Challenger, 06-06-2014, Semifinals, Clay with Norbert Gombos getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:13:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pavlasek and Gombos have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pavlasek winning 1 times and Gombos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pavlasek winning 1, and Gombos 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavlasek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gombos has played against players with an average rank of 315.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavlasek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gombos has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavlasek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gombos has converted 36.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
887
Rank
72
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
1
Hard0
0
Clay2
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
557
Rank
80
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (294-208)
Career Total W/L
56% (522-404)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$264,170
Career Prize Money
$1,135,685
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Adam Pavlasek vs Norbert Gombos For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pavlasek VS Gombos
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Adam Pavlasek | Norbert Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 5 |
| Games Won | 39 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:13:55 | 0:13:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (21/42) | 55% (29/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (12/21) | 69% (20/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (7/21) | 67% (16/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 100% (5/5) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (17/53) | 55% (23/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Norbert Gombos
Player
Adam Pavlasek
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adam Pavlasek | Norbert Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (17/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (184/217) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 329.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (657/1245) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (465/657) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (279/588) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (42/115) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (475/1279) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Adam Pavlasek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Adam Pavlasek
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Adam Pavlasek
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Artur Kukasian
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Adam Pavlasek
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Mark Havlicek
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Bozo Barun
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Adam Pavlasek
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Yann Wojcik
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Adam Pavlasek
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Norbert Gombos
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Alexey Zakharov
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Norbert Gombos
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Andrea Picchione
51%
(
64 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
50%
(
31 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Norbert Gombos
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Mateus Alves
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Henri Laaksonen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Pavlasek Vs Gombos Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pavlasek are available here and Gombos photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
